Which is more pythonic, factory as a function in a module, or as a method on the class it creates?
I have some Python code that creates a Calendar object based on parsed VEvent objects from and iCalendar file.
The calendar object just has a method that adds events as they get parsed.
Now I want to create a factory function that creates a calendar from a file object, path, or URL.
I've been using the iCalendar python module, which implements a factory function as a class method directly on the Class that it returns an instance of:
cal = icalendar.Calendar.from_string(data)
From what little I know about Java, this is a common pattern in Java code, though I seem to find more references to a factory method being on a different class than the class you actually want to instantiate instances from.
The question is, is this also considered Pythonic ? Or is it considered more pythonic to just create a module-level method as the factory function ?
Asked by: Luke327 | Posted: 28-01-2022
[Note. Be very cautious about separating "Calendar" a collection of events, and "Event" - a single event on a calendar. In your question, it seems like there could be some confusion.]
There are many variations on the Factory design pattern.
A stand-alone convenience function (e.g., calendarMaker(data))
A separate class (e.g., CalendarParser) which builds your target class (Calendar).
A class-level method (e.g. Calendar.from_string) method.
These have different purposes. All are Pythonic, the questions are "what do you mean?" and "what's likely to change?" Meaning is everything; change is important.
Convenience functions are Pythonic. Languages like Java can't have free-floating functions; you must wrap a lonely function in a class. Python allows you to have a lonely function without the overhead of a class. A function is relevant when your constructor has no state changes or alternate strategies or any memory of previous actions.
Sometimes folks will define a class and then provide a convenience function that makes an instance of the class, sets the usual parameters for state and strategy and any other configuration, and then calls the single relevant method of the class. This gives you both the statefulness of class plus the flexibility of a stand-alone function.
The class-level method pattern is used, but it has limitations. One, it's forced to rely on class-level variables. Since these can be confusing, a complex constructor as a static method runs into problems when you need to add features (like statefulness or alternative strategies.) Be sure you're never going to expand the static method.
Two, it's more-or-less irrelevant to the rest of the class methods and attributes. This kind of
from_string is just one of many alternative encodings for your Calendar objects. You might have a
from_YAML and on and on. None of this has the least relevance to what a Calendar IS or what it DOES. These methods are all about how a Calendar is encoded for transmission.
What you'll see in the mature Python libraries is that factories are separate from the things they create. Encoding (as strings, XML, JSON, YAML) is subject to a great deal of more-or-less random change. The essential thing, however, rarely changes.
Separate the two concerns. Keep encoding and representation as far away from state and behavior as you can.Answered by: Thomas842 | Posted: 01-03-2022
It's pythonic not to think about esoteric difference in some pattern you read somewhere and now want to use everywhere, like the factory pattern.
Most of the time you would think of a @staticmethod as a solution it's probably better to use a module function, except when you stuff multiple classes in one module and each has a different implementation of the same interface, then it's better to use a @staticmethod
Ultimately weather you create your instances by a @staticmethod or by module function makes little difference.
I'd probably use the initializer ( __init__ ) of a class because one of the more accepted "patterns" in python is that the factory for a class is the class initialization.Answered by: Lenny162 | Posted: 01-03-2022
IMHO a module-level method is a cleaner solution. It hides behind the Python module system that gives it a unique namespace prefix, something the "factory pattern" is commonly used for.Answered by: Owen240 | Posted: 01-03-2022
The factory pattern has its own strengths and weaknesses. However, choosing one way to create instances usually has little pragmatic effect on your code.Answered by: Julian577 | Posted: 01-03-2022
A staticmethod rarely has value, but a classmethod may be useful. It depends on what you want the class and the factory function to actually do.
A factory function in a module would always make an instance of the 'right' type (where 'right' in your case is the 'Calendar' class always, but you might also make it dependant on the contents of what it is creating the instance out of.)
Use a classmethod if you wish to make it dependant not on the data, but on the class you call it on. A classmethod is like a staticmethod in that you can call it on the class, without an instance, but it receives the class it was called on as first argument. This allows you to actually create an instance of that class, which may be a subclass of the original class. An example of a classmethod is dict.fromkeys(), which creates a dict from a list of keys and a single value (defaulting to None.) Because it's a classmethod, when you subclass dict you get the 'fromkeys' method entirely for free. Here's an example of how one could write dict.fromkeys() oneself:
Answered by: Alissa488 | Posted: 01-03-2022
class dict_with_fromkeys(dict): @classmethod def fromkeys(cls, keys, value=None): self = cls() for key in keys: self[key] = value return self
python - What is the most pythonic way to make a bound method act like a function?
I'm using a Python API that expects me to pass it a function. However, for various reasons, I want to pass it a method, because I want the function to behave different depending on the instance it belongs to. If I pass it a method, the API will not call it with the correct 'self' argument, so I'm wondering how to turn a method into a function that knows what 'self' it belongs to. There are a couple of ways that I ...
python - Select a function in a Pythonic way
Suppose I have the following vars: x y and functions: def runx(x): print(x) def runy(y): print (y) def runxy(x, y): print(x + y) def nonexy(): print('none') What's the Pythonic way to choose a function based on the next requirements: -If value is only greater than y run the func runy
python - How to write the function in a more pythonic way?
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guid...
python - Simple return function, what is more Pythonic?
This question already has answers here:
python - Which is the most pythonic way for writing a prime number function using for and while loop?
I am about to execute a function which aim is to return a Prime/Not prime statement if its argument is or isn't a prime number. I succeeded using a for loop: def prime1(n): z =  for i in range (1, n+1): if (n/i).is_integer(): z.append(i) i=i+1 if len(z) == 2: print ("Prime") else: print ("Not prime")` Then I tried to do the same but using the while loop:
python - How can I do this function pythonic?
This question already has answers here:
Is there a common way to check in Python if an object is any function type?
I have a function in Python which is iterating over the attributes returned from dir(obj), and I want to check to see if any of the objects contained within is a function, method, built-in function, etc. Normally you could use callable() for this, but I don't want to include classes. The best I've come up with so far is: isinstance(obj, (types.BuiltinFunctionType, types.FunctionTy...
Is there a function in python to split a word into a list?
This question already has answers here:
Is there a function in Python to split a string without ignoring the spaces?
Is there a function in Python to split a string without ignoring the spaces in the resulting list? E.g: s="This is the string I want to split".split() gives me >>> s ['This', 'is', 'the', 'string', 'I', 'want', 'to', 'split'] I want something like ['This',' ','is',' ', 'the',' ','string', ' ', .....]
unicode - Python: Use the codecs module or use string function decode?
I have a text file that is encoded in UTF-8. I'm reading it in to analyze and plot some data. I would like the file to be read in as ascii. Would it be best to use the codecs module or use the builtin string decode method? Also, the file is divided up as a csv, so could the csv module also be a valid solution? Thanks for your help.
How do I get the name of a function or method from within a Python function or method?
I feel like I should know this, but I haven't been able to figure it out... I want to get the name of a method--which happens to be an integration test--from inside it so it can print out some diagnostic text. I can, of course, just hard-code the method's name in the string, but I'd like to make the test a little more DRY if possible.
Lambda function for classes in python?
There must be an easy way to do this, but somehow I can wrap my head around it. The best way I can describe what I want is a lambda function for a class. I have a library that expects as an argument an uninstantiated version of a class to work with. It then instantiates the class itself to work on. The problem is that I'd like to be able to dynamically create versions of the class, to pass to the library, but I can't figur...
function pointers in python
I would like to do something like the following: def add(a, b): #some code def subtract(a, b): #some code operations = [add, subtract] operations( 5,3) operations(5,3) In python, is it possible to assign something like a function pointer?
python - Django foreign key access in save() function
Here's my code: class Publisher(models.Model): name = models.CharField( max_length = 200, unique = True, ) url = models.URLField() def __unicode__(self): return self.name def save(self): pass class Item(models.Model): publisher = models.ForeignKey(Publisher) name = models.CharField( max_...
python - make a parent function return - super return?
there is a check I need to perform after each subsequent step in a function, so I wanted to define that step as a function within a function. >>> def gs(a,b): ... def ry(): ... if a==b: ... return a ... ... ry() ... ... a += 1 ... ry() ... ... b*=2 ... ry() ... >>> gs(1,2) # should return 2 >>> gs(1,1) # should return 1 >>> gs(5,3) # should return 6...
python - Safe escape function for terminal output
I'm looking for the equivalent of a urlencode for terminal output -- I need to make sure that garbage characters I (may) print from an external source don't end up doing funky things to my terminal, so a prepackaged function to escape special character sequences would be ideal. I'm working in Python, but anything I ...
Still can't find your answer? Check out these communities...
PySlackers | Full Stack Python | NHS Python | Pythonist Cafe | Hacker Earth | Discord Python